Lily Adams
#21
I'm a fan of her's too. Thought she was done but new scene released today for BlacksonBlondes. Big Grin

[Image: 217.jpg]
Reply
#22
All naked but keeps her shoes on during sex?
It ruined the scene for me cause I really like her body and legs.
I don't get why they do this...
[-] The following 1 user Likes NiceHot's post:
  • whiteisright4bbc
Reply
#23
Don't you just love it when these chicks for from 0 to 60 on BLACK KAWK likes it's nobodies business. 
[Image: tumblr_p5wjlzXvwU1wt8g44o1_1280.jpg]

[Image: lily-adams-first-interracial-dark-x-16.jpg]
[-] The following 1 user Likes AZ Rock's post:
  • danhill544
Reply
#24
(07-10-2018, 06:29 PM)NiceHot Wrote: All naked but keeps her shoes on during sex?
It ruined the scene for me cause I really like her body and legs.
I don't get why they do this...

If I were to psychoanalyze them, I believe it's because they think it plays up the 'teen' aspect in their eyes. I've noticed it in a lot of teen themed scenes across various sites/companies/directors, so it's just a common perception/thought process. I'm not a fan of it myself as I don't have a shoe fetish or anything, but to be fair, she is completely nude in her HardX and Once You Go Black scenes, so it's at least an even distribution (even though I personally don't believe 50% of men have a tennis shoes/sock fetish, but whatever).
[Image: 7p10mnlqnzhmwpza.gif]
[-] The following 1 user Likes whiteisright4bbc's post:
  • NiceHot
Reply
#25
(07-04-2018, 09:01 AM)whiteisright4bbc Wrote: I find a few things 'weird' about this post. 1.) What does her being American have to do with anything? Misha Cross held out for a payday and isn't American. 2.) I'd like for you to post proof that most girls in the U.S. charge more for IR. If you have access to most of the porn girls' rates, be my guest and share them. 3.) 'Why wouldn't someone do something' isn't proof that they are doing something. 4.) Why would she need to come out and say she doesn't charge more to prove she doesn't charge more? The burden of proof is on those, like you, saying she charges more, not on her to say she doesn't. 5.) You can be skeptical all you want, but understand that 'this is X we're talking about here' is not a valid argument of anything unless your initials are DJT. In reality, facts and the truth are the only things that hold weight.

I haven't posted in about a week because I found the idea of responding to this post daunting. There are plenty of articles posted on this very site, to validate my claim, or at least I thought there where. The was an article with Mandingo, Lex, and Sean Michaels where they talked about race rates, but I cant seem to find it.

I did find this though. Take it or leave it. If this isn't good enough I wont bring it up again with out better proof. Even though I'm pretty sure I'm right, I could be wrong.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-real-r...ref=author
"“I’m a performer, director, producer, and distributor so I know I’m being jacked. So now I pay a $200 to $400 premium because I’m black?” says Steele. This would most likely be branded discriminatory in other industries, but not in porn."

http://www.businessinsider.com/pornograp...lem-2015-9
"Even porn's pay scale has racist implications. A standard "boy-girl" scene generally earns a female star around $1,000, according to Mark Spiegler, one of the industry's top talent agents. After that, pay often increases with the degree of difficulty or taboo of the scene. Anal sex comes with a price tag of roughly $1,200 and up, and double penetration runs around $1,400, says Spiegler. Spiegler's agency does not charge extra for "interracial," but others do."
Reply
#26
^ I remember the article you're referring to. I'm not denying that some girls charge more for IR. I'm simply stating you can't assume that any one girl does charge more based on zero physical evidence. I'm basically arguing innocent until proven guilty whereas you are arguing guilty until proven innocent.

You can be pretty sure you're right all you want, there's still no evidence that you are actually correct. You could argue there is no evidence that you're not incorrect, but that just leaves us at a stalemate. It's the equivalent of arguing there's no evidence someone didn't commit murder. Okay, fine, but there's also no evidence that they did. So what do you do? Lock them up? Right.

Once again, Malile, in case you missed it: I'm not arguing that some girls don't charge more for IR. I'm simply arguing that you don't know with 100% certainty (or any certainty for that matter) that any one girl personally charges more for IR. You just don't. And what must be even more frustrating for you, is that unless you can get their pay stub or something, you will never know.
[Image: 7p10mnlqnzhmwpza.gif]
[-] The following 1 user Likes whiteisright4bbc's post:
  • Black19magic85
Reply
#27
What I was trying to prove was whether charging more is the common practice. If so, why not assume any given girl charges more until proven otherwise. I think has less to do with semantics than practicality and generalization. If I know for fact at least 51 percent of girls who do IR charge a premium for it, I personally would not give the other 49 percent the benefit of a doubt. But as you said I dont have those numbers.
Reply
#28
^ The problem with that is we don't know how many girls charge more and how many don't. We just don't have enough information. If we don't have any information, why should we err on either side of the equation? Shouldn't we just admit that we don't have enough information and be done with it? Why pick a side and assume it's the correct one?

Again, you're taking a guilty until proven innocent approach when I'm saying we don't know the numbers, so why would we choose that side? Yeah, but why generalize? Why not just judge each girl on an individual basis and go off of actual evidence instead of assumptions and generalizations? Doesn't that make more sense?

But you don't know for a fact that at least 51% of girls who do IR charge a premium for it. That's what I've been saying this whole time. We. Don't. Have. Enough. Information. Do we even have access to 5% of the girls' information? 3%? 1%? How can you base something off of less than 1% (if that) of information? Just seems absolutely insane if you ask me.

And even if it was 51%, you really would assume guilty until proven innocent on basically a coin flip? Boy, I sure hope you never get appointed for jury duty. Jeez, man.
[Image: 7p10mnlqnzhmwpza.gif]
[-] The following 1 user Likes whiteisright4bbc's post:
  • Black19magic85
Reply
#29
Dogfart doesn't shoot women who charge more for IR so no way Lily Adams does this.

With the topic of if it happens at all. In 2016 an agency did a Black History month deal where women lowered their IR rate. It was outed by Ana Foxxx.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BBrZ68HJqGk/
Reply
#30
(07-11-2018, 05:32 AM)whiteisright4bbc Wrote:
(07-10-2018, 06:29 PM)NiceHot Wrote: All naked but keeps her shoes on during sex?
It ruined the scene for me cause I really like her body and legs.
I don't get why they do this...

If I were to psychoanalyze them, I believe it's because they think it plays up the 'teen' aspect in their eyes. I've noticed it in a lot of teen themed scenes across various sites/companies/directors, so it's just a common perception/thought process. I'm not a fan of it myself as I don't have a shoe fetish or anything, but to be fair, she is completely nude in her HardX and Once You Go Black scenes, so it's at least an even distribution (even though I personally don't believe 50% of men have a tennis shoes/sock fetish, but whatever).

You have a point there, and maybe that is why they do it.
But they have to remember, a beautiful teen's feet are not be kept covered.
Sex or not, it's always a big turn on.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)