Hot teacher
#11
(08-03-2018, 09:24 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(08-03-2018, 08:58 PM)AussieCuck Wrote: I don't think there is a thread for this, but there are are other threads about OTHER teacher doing the same shit. It's so fucking common.

At some point the boys and I should round them up, merge them and make a single thread.

Personally, I would rather round up all those hot teachers and fuck their brains out but I guess that's pretty much unrealistic lol
                                                                               

         [Image: O2OK5gJ7_o.gif]   

HE HAS BRING THE RUCKUS
TO ALL YOU MUTHAFUCKAS

XD XD XD         
                              
[-] The following 1 user Likes blacksquatchman's post:
  • Shotgun Styles
Reply
#12
There's a new story every week about a female teacher banging male students. This means I need to hear from some male teachers. I guarantee these teachers would glady choose a colleague first over a student.
Reply
#13
(08-07-2018, 10:11 AM)kcjones Wrote: There's a new story every week about a female teacher banging male students.  This means I need to hear from some male teachers.  I guarantee these teachers would glady choose a colleague first over a student.

There are legalities that enjoin with that question.

Having said that, the male teachers who do this don't make the news. They are simply thrown in prison for very long periods, then dropped onto Megan's Shit List forever.

The hypocrisy with regard to enforcement of "statutory" laws is flagrantly unconstitutional.
White Girl Connoisseur

Reply
#14
(08-07-2018, 03:50 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(08-07-2018, 10:11 AM)kcjones Wrote: There's a new story every week about a female teacher banging male students.  This means I need to hear from some male teachers.  I guarantee these teachers would glady choose a colleague first over a student.

There are legalities that enjoin with that question.

Having said that, the male teachers who do this don't make the news. They are simply thrown in prison for very long periods, then dropped onto Megan's Shit List forever.

The hypocrisy with regard to enforcement of "statutory" laws is flagrantly unconstitutional.

I should have been more concise.  I meant that male teachers have first crack at any young female teacher looking for a "Fun Time".  There aren't many single male teachers, so many young teachers look to their students.
Reply
#15
(08-07-2018, 07:16 PM)kcjones Wrote:
(08-07-2018, 03:50 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(08-07-2018, 10:11 AM)kcjones Wrote: There's a new story every week about a female teacher banging male students.  This means I need to hear from some male teachers.  I guarantee these teachers would glady choose a colleague first over a student.

There are legalities that enjoin with that question.

Having said that, the male teachers who do this don't make the news. They are simply thrown in prison for very long periods, then dropped onto Megan's Shit List forever.

The hypocrisy with regard to enforcement of "statutory" laws is flagrantly unconstitutional.

I should have been more concise.  I meant that male teachers have first crack at any young female teacher looking for a "Fun Time".  There aren't many single male teachers, so many young teachers look to their students.
Someone preying on teenagers does it for control,power dynamic,etc. Plenty of these women were also married.
Reply
#16
"Someone preying on teenagers does it for control,power dynamic,etc. Plenty of these women were also married."

That's true some times, especially with male teachers preying on young female students. If you look at many of the stories of female teachers, they are sleeping with alpha teens, not betas. My female teacher friends say that these women are competing with the female students for the most "in-demand" boys. In essence reliving their past, hoping to bag the quarterback or homecoming king they could never get back in the day. If true, a single male teacher (which there are few in any particular school) provides these delusional female teachers the chance to one up her colleagues, which trumps bagging a student.
Reply
#17
I thought it was particularly interesting that this teacher was married to a cop! That guys life is hell now! his wife is convicted of sucking off 14yo boys!!!
Reply
#18
(08-07-2018, 10:04 PM)sapphi10489 Wrote: Someone preying on teenagers does it for control,power dynamic,etc. Plenty of these women were also married.

Jesus, the fucking PC language in this post. Good lord.

You are aware that this is a porn forum, are you not?

First of all "preying" in this context is a weasel word. It presupposes facts not in evidence. If a 25 year old guy falls in love with a 15 year old high school girl, marries her, and spends the next 30 years together, did he "prey" on her?

I've mentioned this before. Sidney Poitier. I read his biography. His parents were 26 and 13 when they got married. He said it's the greatest relationship he's ever known of, primarily because his father always kept his mother's counsel. They communicated.

The entire idea of the "sex predator" in the age of consent context was wholly manufactured during the late 20th century. It's fake, it doesn't exist and there's no scientific data to back up the idea that sex is harmful to teenagers or that dating older people is harmful to teenagers. And before you post some bullshit psychologist's "study", remember that PSYCHOLOGY IS NOT SCIENCE. That's not my opinion, it's a fact.

People date and fuck outside their age bracket for a wide variety of reasons. Are some of those reasons exploitative? Of course. But people do all kinds of otherwise harmless things for exploitative reasons. A salesman complimenting a woman's intelligence to gain her confidence and screw her in the fine print. But to hear you tell it, saying chick is smart is "preying" on her just because SOME people use that tactic abusively.

Logic, reason and science, people. That's the standard you'll be held to around here. SJW and PC nonsense like "banging teenagers is EXPLOITATION!" will get you called onto the carpet to provide proof of such a claim.
White Girl Connoisseur

[-] The following 1 user Likes Shotgun Styles's post:
  • blacksquatchman
Reply
#19
(08-08-2018, 04:11 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(08-07-2018, 10:04 PM)sapphi10489 Wrote: Someone preying on teenagers does it for control,power dynamic,etc. Plenty of these women were also married.

Jesus, the fucking PC language in this post. Good lord.

You are aware that this is a porn forum, are you not?

First of all "preying" in this context is a weasel word. It presupposes facts not in evidence. If a 25 year old guy falls in love with a 15 year old high school girl, marries her, and spends the next 30 years together, did he "prey" on her?

I've mentioned this before. Sidney Poitier. I read his biography. His parents were 26 and 13 when they got married. He said it's the greatest relationship he's ever known of, primarily because his father always kept his mother's counsel. They communicated.

The entire idea of the "sex predator" in the age of consent context was wholly manufactured during the late 20th century. It's fake, it doesn't exist and there's no scientific data to back up the idea that sex is harmful to teenagers or that dating older people is harmful to teenagers. And before you post some bullshit psychologist's "study", remember that PSYCHOLOGY IS NOT SCIENCE. That's not my opinion, it's a fact.

People date and fuck outside their age bracket for a wide variety of reasons. Are some of those reasons exploitative? Of course. But people do all kinds of otherwise harmless things for exploitative reasons. A salesman complimenting a woman's intelligence to gain her confidence and screw her in the fine print. But to hear you tell it, saying chick is smart is  "preying" on her just because SOME people use that tactic abusively.

Logic, reason and science, people. That's the standard you'll be held to around here. SJW and PC nonsense like "banging teenagers is EXPLOITATION!" will get you called onto the carpet to provide proof of such a claim.
Teacher having sex with a student is a whole different power dynamic. Which is why 16 is the age of consent in places but there is an exception if you're a teacher. In the past it was about life expectancy and fertility. And I don't think marrying a 13 year old was ever accepted. Sidney Poitier parents were rural farmers in Bahamas.Stuff like this does go on in rural society because of low population,poverty,etc.But its not really accepted outside of that.

Nothing wrong with dating outside age bracket.Its a different discussion if you're talking about someone prepubescent or if you have power over that person.
Reply
#20
(08-08-2018, 05:20 PM)sapphi10489 Wrote: Teacher having sex with a student is a whole different power dynamic.

But you didn't say "a teacher". You said "someone", which is to say "anyone." To which I take issue. Cops, teachers, step parents, etc all have a responsibility not to involve themselves sexually with people in their charge. That is agreed upon.

But that ain't what you said.

(08-08-2018, 05:20 PM)sapphi10489 Wrote: Which is why 16 is the age of consent in places but there is an exception if you're a teacher. In the past it was about life expectancy and fertility.

The age of consent is arbitrary. It's based largely on the ridiculous notion that men are inherently dangerous, that sex is inherently harmful, and that young people are inherently idiots. None of those things are true, and I defy you to find science that proves otherwise.

There has developed an unholy alliance between SJW/Feminists who hate men and Conservative Puritans who hate sex. From the left and the right you get these ugly anti-sex policies like Sesta/Fosta that tend to do more harm than good. "Statutory" laws make real predators hard to find and track because they clog the system up with run of the mill teen sex cases. Megan's list is nearly useless to law enforcement now because the vast majority of people on it aren't predators. But they've been labeled as such for political reasons. Good luck trying to find the next Philip Garrido needle in that haystack.

(08-08-2018, 05:20 PM)sapphi10489 Wrote: And I don't think marrying a 13 year old was ever accepted.

How old are you? Teen marriage wasn't just accepted, it was the norm. In early America is was rare for a female to reach 20 without being married already. You clearly don't know your history.

(08-08-2018, 05:20 PM)sapphi10489 Wrote: Sidney Poitier parents were rural farmers in Bahamas.Stuff like this does go on in rural society because of low population,poverty,etc.But its not really accepted outside of that.

Accepted by whom? The "age of consent" is a 20th century invention. You do realize that don't you? Throughout the ENTIRETY of human history girls as young as 12 or 13 have been successfully bearing children and raising families. Now, in the age of well understood pregnancy precautions and birth control, teen sex has been rendered nearly harmless. And yet it's never been more criminalized. The reasons have nothing to do with science of or fact, and everything to do with the gotcha politics of our day.

(08-08-2018, 05:20 PM)sapphi10489 Wrote: Nothing wrong with dating outside age bracket.Its a different discussion if you're talking about someone prepubescent or if you have power over that person.

Agreed that people should't be diddling little kids. But 13 is not prepubescent, and most of these teacher cases involve kids between 14 and 16. Do I think those teachers should be fired? Yep. Do I think they should be arrested? Hell no. That's some fascistic police state bullshit.
White Girl Connoisseur

[-] The following 1 user Likes Shotgun Styles's post:
  • FastHeinz
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)