Alex Jones caught watching tranny porn
#21
Oh, the list of fucked up shit on the internets is way longer. Futa, Shotacon, incest, tentacles, Loli. The web is a veritable cornucopia of shit that should never be thought of, much less made, looked at, searched for, or fapped to.
White Girl Connoisseur
[Image: OxvA.gif]
[-] The following 2 users Like Shotgun Styles's post:
  • nvdiceguy, Ipay4
Reply
#22
I know few people here watch vanilla, but Brazzers used to have a site called Pornstar Punshment. The whole thing was basically rape porn with aggressive dudes like James Deen going in on the chicks, mid-2000s Euro porn style. It was one of their most popular sites, so that should tell you something. Rumor has it that external forces influenced them to kill that site (Visa not wanting to do business). And remember the old Max Hardcore scenes? I bet people who had that shit on their computers were on some sort of fed watch list for a while. If he weren't making bank producing it, he wouldn't have been making it. Lastly, Khan Tusion's stuff. Rough sex can be hot when the chick is into it Chastity Lynn or Yhivi style, but his shit was straight misogynistic. A lot of freaky stuff out there for the freaks. Motherless is another example, and that site has been toned WAY down. Channers believe it used to be a fed honeypot.

Trans porn is a super fast growing segment of the porn market. Why, I can only speculate. Maybe it's a result of escalation from porn addiction (think about what you'd watch in your early porn days compared to what you'll watch now......I remember when DPs and swollowing used to shock me). Maybe it's novelty or just shock value. Hell, maybe people just like it and it's just that.
Reply
#23
Like I said, porn twists the sensibilities. The need for more and more stimulation when it comes to dopamine releases is well understood. Also, when you’re young you don’t know about what women really like. You have this Pollyanna romantic view (if you were raised that way). You grow up and find out that there are some nasty ass hoes and freaks. They don’t want your fucking poetry. She wants to be held down and hard dicked within an inch of her life.

Once you’ve seen what women are really like, you never really get back that sense of wonder. Women used to be magical creatures to me. Now, unless she’s really smart or sweet (i.e. “special”) she’s just meat. Another mouse to feed my boa constrictor.
White Girl Connoisseur
[Image: OxvA.gif]
[-] The following 1 user Likes Shotgun Styles's post:
  • simonphoenix
Reply
#24
(09-02-2018, 11:56 AM)Shotgun Styles Wrote: Oh, the list of fucked up shit on the internets is way longer. Futa, Shotacon, incest, tentacles, Loli. The web is a veritable cornucopia of shit that should never be thought of, much less made, looked at, searched for, or fapped to.

tentacles!
Reply
#25
(09-02-2018, 03:04 PM)311 and Whooty Wrote: I know few people here watch vanilla, but Brazzers used to have a site called Pornstar Punshment. The whole thing was basically rape porn with aggressive dudes like James Deen going in on the chicks, mid-2000s Euro porn style. It was one of their most popular sites, so that should tell you something. Rumor has it that external forces influenced them to kill that site (Visa not wanting to do business). And remember the old Max Hardcore scenes? I bet people who had that shit on their computers were on some sort of fed watch list for a while. If he weren't making bank producing it, he wouldn't have been making it. Lastly, Khan Tusion's stuff. Rough sex can be hot when the chick is into it Chastity Lynn or Yhivi style, but his shit was straight misogynistic. A lot of freaky stuff out there for the freaks. Motherless is another example, and that site has been toned WAY down. Channers believe it used to be a fed honeypot.

Trans porn is a super fast growing segment of the porn market. Why, I can only speculate. Maybe it's a result of escalation from porn addiction (think about what you'd watch in your early porn days compared to what you'll watch now......I remember when DPs and swollowing used to shock me). Maybe it's novelty or just shock value. Hell, maybe people just like it and it's just that.

Now the real question is if you watch a trans video with a trans fucking a girl, is it gay?
Reply
#26
(09-01-2018, 03:52 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(09-01-2018, 01:49 AM)george909 Wrote:
(08-25-2018, 04:08 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote: Oops!

But, as he said under oath in his custody hearing, he's just playing a character. He's already admitted that he's a fake, so this won't really hurt him.

Really!?!? this whole time i thought he really acted like that. so your telling me he puts on a WWE like persona to attract more media basically? or is it a defense tactic for court?

Does it even matter?  
Lets say he claims it was just a defense in court, so he lies to the court of law under penalty of perjury (5 years in prison and a big fine + criminal record) about these convictions and beliefs he holds so deeply to gain an upper hand.  yet we are to believe he would tell us the truth on the internet?

Lets say his claims are true, he plays a character.  Well then he is a fake and a phony a fabrication who is at best, good entertainment.

Either he is a character like a WWE character who just says things for entertainment/attention or he lied in court who can't be believed.

It had long been rumoured/suspected that Jones was a fake who was designed to make people who believe in conspiracy theories look like cooks.  They point to his behaviour on Pierce Morgan as exhibit A.



I don't mind a good conspiracy theory, but come on man, suicide pills, mass murder pills, yelling like a mad man, he is actually making a good argument for gun control here because he portrays a character who is psychologically unstable throughout the entire interview that most sane people will think a guy like this really should have his guns taken away because he seems so unstable.
hahaha, man you may be right about taking his guns away. i want to believe that is really him but if it is just a act Mr.Machahon need to sign this man urgently! i will start watching wrestling again if he stars. his whole backstory should be based on trying to either dismantle the WWE, it would be awesome.
Reply
#27
(09-02-2018, 05:47 PM)george909 Wrote:
(09-01-2018, 03:52 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(09-01-2018, 01:49 AM)george909 Wrote:
(08-25-2018, 04:08 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote: Oops!

But, as he said under oath in his custody hearing, he's just playing a character. He's already admitted that he's a fake, so this won't really hurt him.

Really!?!? this whole time i thought he really acted like that. so your telling me he puts on a WWE like persona to attract more media basically? or is it a defense tactic for court?

Does it even matter?  
Lets say he claims it was just a defense in court, so he lies to the court of law under penalty of perjury (5 years in prison and a big fine + criminal record) about these convictions and beliefs he holds so deeply to gain an upper hand.  yet we are to believe he would tell us the truth on the internet?

Lets say his claims are true, he plays a character.  Well then he is a fake and a phony a fabrication who is at best, good entertainment.

Either he is a character like a WWE character who just says things for entertainment/attention or he lied in court who can't be believed.

It had long been rumoured/suspected that Jones was a fake who was designed to make people who believe in conspiracy theories look like cooks.  They point to his behaviour on Pierce Morgan as exhibit A.



I don't mind a good conspiracy theory, but come on man, suicide pills, mass murder pills, yelling like a mad man, he is actually making a good argument for gun control here because he portrays a character who is psychologically unstable throughout the entire interview that most sane people will think a guy like this really should have his guns taken away because he seems so unstable.
hahaha, man you may be right about taking his guns away. i want to believe that is really him but if it is just a act Mr.Machahon need to sign this man urgently! i will start watching wrestling again if he stars. his whole backstory should be based on trying to either dismantle the WWE, it would be awesome.

You have to understand most liberal voters are the gun control crowd and the largest group of the liberal coalition are the suburban white soccer moms thinking about little jimmy being shot down by some psychotic adult male or worse their white husband doing a murder suicide.  While most black people could careless if people like Jones had a gun because they would never live near a delusional white male like this (by choice or on purpose); these white suburban soccer moms have fears and Jones is playing right into the hands of gun control liberals who operate off those fears.  Like in the Simpson episode where Lisa pointed out to Homer when he became a gun owner/NRA member that gun owners are most likely to kill someone in their own family than an intruder.

"They found that a gun in the home was associated with a nearly threefold increase in the odds that someone would be killed at home by a family member or intimate acquaintance."
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...nce-shows/

Look at what his ex-wife said" “I am afraid that he is going to be so upset and out of control that it will even be more dangerous,” she told Inside Edition. ".  Since white females are the largest voting block and also suffer the most number of numerical killings from white male gun owners, as in white culture the men often murder their wives when the relation falls apart, all you have to do is pitch these guys like Alex Jones as dangerous men who might go out and kill off their families to get through gun control.

I'm not a fan of gun control per se, I think people should be able to get a gun if they need one, I have no desire for one.

I think he would have been an awesome wrestler, he is charismatic, psychotic, has a good story line, the only problem is he is short and fat and unathletic.


But come on, this guy writes his own story lines

[Image: 21-Alex-Jones.w710.h473.2x.jpg]


[Image: maxresdefault.jpg]


[Image: BreJKHoCIAE-rrT.jpg]

[Image: CwnoZsEUkAAt0ia.jpg]

Imagine having to work for a guy like that who just randomly takes his clothes off in the office. LOL
Reply
#28
(09-02-2018, 03:56 PM)Ipay4 Wrote: Now the real question is if you watch a trans video with a trans fucking a girl, is it gay?

Gay guys don't like trannies, so I'm gonna say no.
Reply
#29
(09-02-2018, 11:16 PM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(09-02-2018, 05:47 PM)george909 Wrote:
(09-01-2018, 03:52 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(09-01-2018, 01:49 AM)george909 Wrote:
(08-25-2018, 04:08 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote: Oops!

But, as he said under oath in his custody hearing, he's just playing a character. He's already admitted that he's a fake, so this won't really hurt him.

Really!?!? this whole time i thought he really acted like that. so your telling me he puts on a WWE like persona to attract more media basically? or is it a defense tactic for court?

Does it even matter?  
Lets say he claims it was just a defense in court, so he lies to the court of law under penalty of perjury (5 years in prison and a big fine + criminal record) about these convictions and beliefs he holds so deeply to gain an upper hand.  yet we are to believe he would tell us the truth on the internet?

Lets say his claims are true, he plays a character.  Well then he is a fake and a phony a fabrication who is at best, good entertainment.

Either he is a character like a WWE character who just says things for entertainment/attention or he lied in court who can't be believed.

It had long been rumoured/suspected that Jones was a fake who was designed to make people who believe in conspiracy theories look like cooks.  They point to his behaviour on Pierce Morgan as exhibit A.



I don't mind a good conspiracy theory, but come on man, suicide pills, mass murder pills, yelling like a mad man, he is actually making a good argument for gun control here because he portrays a character who is psychologically unstable throughout the entire interview that most sane people will think a guy like this really should have his guns taken away because he seems so unstable.
hahaha, man you may be right about taking his guns away. i want to believe that is really him but if it is just a act Mr.Machahon need to sign this man urgently! i will start watching wrestling again if he stars. his whole backstory should be based on trying to either dismantle the WWE, it would be awesome.

You have to understand most liberal voters are the gun control crowd and the largest group of the liberal coalition are the suburban white soccer moms thinking about little jimmy being shot down by some psychotic adult male or worse their white husband doing a murder suicide.  While most black people could careless if people like Jones had a gun because they would never live near a delusional white male like this (by choice or on purpose); these white suburban soccer moms have fears and Jones is playing right into the hands of gun control liberals who operate off those fears.  Like in the Simpson episode where Lisa pointed out to Homer when he became a gun owner/NRA member that gun owners are most likely to kill someone in their own family than an intruder.

"They found that a gun in the home was associated with a nearly threefold increase in the odds that someone would be killed at home by a family member or intimate acquaintance."
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...nce-shows/

Look at what his ex-wife said" “I am afraid that he is going to be so upset and out of control that it will even be more dangerous,” she told Inside Edition. ".  Since white females are the largest voting block and also suffer the most number of numerical killings from white male gun owners, as in white culture the men often murder their wives when the relation falls apart, all you have to do is pitch these guys like Alex Jones as dangerous men who might go out and kill off their families to get through gun control.

I'm not a fan of gun control per se, I think people should be able to get a gun if they need one, I have no desire for one.

I think he would have been an awesome wrestler, he is charismatic, psychotic, has a good story line, the only problem is he is short and fat and unathletic.


But come on, this guy writes his own story lines

[Image: 21-Alex-Jones.w710.h473.2x.jpg]


[Image: maxresdefault.jpg]


[Image: BreJKHoCIAE-rrT.jpg]

[Image: CwnoZsEUkAAt0ia.jpg]

Imagine having to work for a guy like that who just randomly takes his clothes off in the office. LOL

hahaha, dude you have you ever seen him when me was young. google his young pictures. he was pretty jacked, i feel like that may be where his habit comes from.
Reply
#30
AJ is a national treasure. I hope he wins whatever lawsuits he has going against the big platforms that all banned him. That's bullshit. Jack (Twitter CEO) was the last hold out, but he folded in a matter of days. Pathetic.

I will grant that Jones was getting out of pocket by saying Sandy Hook was a hoax. That's just ignorant. But it's not illegal. They want to blame him for dummies threatening the victims families. He should be able to easily defend himself, absolved by the fact that he never once endorsed or incited threats of violence.

Shit, it's real shit happening the world that sets people off. So we can start blaming all journalists for reporting the crazy shit in the world that supposedly inspired more crazy people? No. We can't do that.

Most of what AJ talks about is rooted in some documented or historical event. It just happens that half of the inferences or implications he goes on to make are silly, but he's just bullshitting or speculating. It's not unlike televangelists.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)