High school teacher exposed by students as a BBC slut (not a joke)
#31
(02-01-2019, 01:54 PM)imperiusrex Wrote: Well here's when I post something I'm sure will be unpopular here, but if she signed a morals clause then she should be fired if the school board or parents or whomever have decided to do so.

"Morals Clauses" violate the First Amendment and therefore should also be illegal.
White Girl Connoisseur

Reply
#32
(02-01-2019, 02:37 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:15 PM)tenley Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 07:36 AM)kunta kinte Wrote: If they fire her from the job they should keep the same energy and fire teachers that are on medical Marijuana since that is also "offensive" to some. The double standard has to stop somewhere

That's legal in California.  They wouldn't have grounds to do so.

Fucking Black dudes on camera is also legal.

He made his point in an inartful way.
Medical marijuana is prescribed by a physician in California for what would qualify as a "disability".
To fire someone for a disability would get the employer in such deep shit legally that they'd have to be an idiot to admit it was the cause of termination.
Fucking Black dudes on camera is legal like medical marijuana (in some states).   Firing someone for something reasonably connected to their disability (medically prescribed marijuana) is going to be blatantly illegal.  Firing someone for fucking on camera, is completely legal.
Reply
#33
(02-01-2019, 11:16 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:54 PM)imperiusrex Wrote: Well here's when I post something I'm sure will be unpopular here, but if she signed a morals clause then she should be fired if the school board or parents or whomever have decided to do so.

"Morals Clauses" violate the First Amendment and therefore should also be illegal.

Lol.  Big Grin
Often times professions and employers seek to ensure that the conduct of their employees is above the mere standard of violating the law. Hence we see more and more moral clause type contracts coming out.

First amendment:
Quote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

What law did congress make in regards to moral clauses of people?

The real solution is going to be making it easier to unionize, workers have no leverage, you can never really cross out terms the employer offers if you need the money. Only a collective bargain can bargain against an employer.
Reply
#34
Also if you are teaching in one of those Christian charter schools or something, you shouldn't be shooting porn, it is contrary to the values of the church and most of these schools.
Reply
#35
(02-01-2019, 11:16 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:54 PM)imperiusrex Wrote: Well here's when I post something I'm sure will be unpopular here, but if she signed a morals clause then she should be fired if the school board or parents or whomever have decided to do so.

"Morals Clauses" violate the First Amendment and therefore should also be illegal.

Where did you read that? I've read they are virtually unenforceable but not illegal which is not the same thing...
[-] The following 1 user Likes imperiusrex's post:
  • thomroyal
Reply
#36
Moral Clauses found in employment acts and contracts are not laws. They are workplace values, guidelines, and Codes of Conduct.

Laws and morals are two completely different animals. In fact, predicating laws on morals is actually against the law. Creates bias and slippery slope situations.

But, as I said, she'll be back collecting apples and handing out hall passes in a few years. No big deal.
Reply
#37
(02-02-2019, 03:32 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 11:16 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:54 PM)imperiusrex Wrote: Well here's when I post something I'm sure will be unpopular here, but if she signed a morals clause then she should be fired if the school board or parents or whomever have decided to do so.

"Morals Clauses" violate the First Amendment and therefore should also be illegal.

Lol.  Big Grin
Often times professions and employers seek to ensure that the conduct of their employees is above the mere standard of violating the law. Hence we see more and more moral clause type contracts coming out.

First amendment:
Quote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

What law did congress make in regards to moral clauses of people?

The real solution is going to be making it easier to unionize, workers have no leverage, you can never really cross out terms the employer offers if you need the money. Only a collective bargain can bargain against an employer.

(02-02-2019, 09:27 AM)imperiusrex Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 11:16 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:54 PM)imperiusrex Wrote: Well here's when I post something I'm sure will be unpopular here, but if she signed a morals clause then she should be fired if the school board or parents or whomever have decided to do so.

"Morals Clauses" violate the First Amendment and therefore should also be illegal.

Where did you read that? I've read they are virtually unenforceable but not illegal which is not the same thing...

(02-02-2019, 10:24 AM)thomroyal Wrote: Moral Clauses found in employment acts and contracts are not laws. They are workplace values, guidelines, and Codes of Conduct.

Laws and morals are two completely different animals. In fact, predicating laws on morals is actually against the law. Creates bias and slippery slope situations.

But, as I said, she'll be back collecting apples and handing out hall passes in a few years. No big deal.

Pornography is constitutionally protected free speech. An employer's "morals clause" seeks to abridge your First Amendment rights OUTSIDE THE WORKPLACE, and that is illegal. If our Supreme Court was not now totally corrupt, this would be a slam dunk win for the teacher.
White Girl Connoisseur

Reply
#38
(02-02-2019, 11:23 AM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-02-2019, 03:32 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 11:16 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:54 PM)imperiusrex Wrote: Well here's when I post something I'm sure will be unpopular here, but if she signed a morals clause then she should be fired if the school board or parents or whomever have decided to do so.

"Morals Clauses" violate the First Amendment and therefore should also be illegal.

Lol.  Big Grin
Often times professions and employers seek to ensure that the conduct of their employees is above the mere standard of violating the law. Hence we see more and more moral clause type contracts coming out.

First amendment:
Quote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

What law did congress make in regards to moral clauses of people?

The real solution is going to be making it easier to unionize, workers have no leverage, you can never really cross out terms the employer offers if you need the money. Only a collective bargain can bargain against an employer.

(02-02-2019, 09:27 AM)imperiusrex Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 11:16 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:54 PM)imperiusrex Wrote: Well here's when I post something I'm sure will be unpopular here, but if she signed a morals clause then she should be fired if the school board or parents or whomever have decided to do so.

"Morals Clauses" violate the First Amendment and therefore should also be illegal.

Where did you read that? I've read they are virtually unenforceable but not illegal which is not the same thing...

(02-02-2019, 10:24 AM)thomroyal Wrote: Moral Clauses found in employment acts and contracts are not laws. They are workplace values, guidelines, and Codes of Conduct.

Laws and morals are two completely different animals. In fact, predicating laws on morals is actually against the law. Creates bias and slippery slope situations.

But, as I said, she'll be back collecting apples and handing out hall passes in a few years. No big deal.

Pornography is constitutionally protected free speech. An employer's "morals clause" seeks to abridge your First Amendment rights OUTSIDE THE WORKPLACE, and that is illegal. If our Supreme Court was not now totally corrupt, this would be a slam dunk win for the teacher.

No, no, no, no.

The First Amendment only protects against LEGAL PROSECUTION, and that's all. If you break your employer's rules, they are well within their right to fire your ass. The First Amendment only means that they cannot sue you. This is what most people don't understand.

If she does take her employer to court and tries to plead the First Amendment, she will lose. Why? Because she agreed to her employers terms when she chose to work there.

The workplace is not the government. It's a third party, and their rules are not legislation. They CANNOT infringe on your First Amendment rights. It's practically impossible. This is also what most people don't understand.
[-] The following 2 users Like thomroyal's post:
  • btsstuff, imperiusrex
Reply
#39
(02-01-2019, 11:01 PM)tenley Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 09:32 PM)old_beginner Wrote:
(02-01-2019, 01:18 PM)tenley Wrote: I remember searching for her a few months ago when I discovered her and couldn't find decent scenes.   I hope that this  doesn't effect her life too deleteriously as the infractions is not the worst and, selfishly, I would like to see more of her content.

Also, since she was at this past AVNs, maybe she was considering becoming more active.  Unlikely, but who knows.

How do you know she was at the avns? This woman could be the next Janet Mason, it would be very saddening if she leaves. However the kind of comments people do on forums about her are so aggressive...I would understand if she hides.

It was in the Barstool article.

Thank you. I took a look. I doubt she will come back, she has too much to loose. But she was a natural, unlike all these plastic chicks of Blacked
Reply
#40
(02-02-2019, 12:59 PM)old_beginner Wrote: Thank you. I took a look. I doubt she will come back, she has too much to loose. But she was a natural, unlike all these plastic chicks of Blacked


Not sure I get this statement. Most of the Blacked girls are decidedly natural. If you mean their performances are fake, I mean, that's porn.
White Girl Connoisseur

[-] The following 1 user Likes Shotgun Styles's post:
  • whiteisright4bbc
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)