WTF Liam Neeson
#61
(02-11-2019, 04:03 PM)Theo Younf Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 04:39 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 02:08 AM)Theo Younf Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 12:49 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-07-2019, 11:19 PM)Shotgun Styles Wrote: Every time I think you can't say something more ridiculous, you say something so outstandingly, ridiculously, incredulously stupid that I am actually shocked to read it.

Nigga.

THE ENTIRE SJW MOVEMENT,

THE WHOLE THING,

IS BASED ON EXACTLY THIS.
No, it isn't SJW are about everyone except black folks
-gays and fags
-trans
-illegals
-humpbacks
-transsexuals
-peg legs
-lesbians
-environment
-protecting religions like muslims
-hispanics
-Asians


Your SJW are the whites in NYC who are stomping on the backs of black kids as teachers telling them this is what slavery would feel like, or they are the white parents in NYC arguing with the principal and superintendent to NOT INTEGRATE the school with black kids.  White SJW hate blacks more than the right wing does, they are just more clever at hiding their anti black hatred.  They will pat  you on the head and say see I love black people, I have a black friend, I slept with a black man, but ask them about what are you going to do punish white supremacist with jail time or what are you going to do to reparate blacks for slavery, jim crow, red lining, discrimination etc. and CRICKETS!  Then they will turn around and tell you about how the gay agenda will help black people because there are gay blacks, but they will never say the black agenda will help gays because there are black gays.

Dr. King was right, white liberal moderates and SJW are worse than the klan.  They make you think they are on your side so they can infiltrate you and attack your movement from the inside.

Ipay4, you are onto something here. Bernie Sanders refused to support reparations for native blacks but then waffles on about these very groups that supposedly have native black people's interest at heart.



His attitude towards blacks is similar to most white Democrats/liberals, including the extreme left of the party, ''progressives'' just like him (i.e. TYT, Liz Warren), very arrogant and racist in their dismissiveness of a black agenda or black concerns. Yet they will speak at length about environmental concerns, LGBTQ rights, (white) feminism, the (white) working class etc. 

Goto 2:20 to the video under.



They will dismiss anything regarding blacks as "identity politics" on one hand but talk about supporting policies for LGBTQ, the white working class etc.

I'm glad Hillary lost because it gave white Democrats like Bernie got a rude awakening that cannot any longer ignore the black voting block who decided that enough was enough.
https://rollingout.com/2015/10/07/obama-...survivors/

So much for "reparations is unfeasible" Sanders.  The party that believes men dressed up like women and freaks and cross dressing should be able to go to washrooms with little girls, when we've all encountered the inkwerekwere who has tried to peek at our dick in the urinal, is telling us how identity politics is wrong?  Funny, do they ever go to AIPAC and tell them all of the middle east matters and identity politics is wrong and we are going to defend all of the middle east.

No black agenda, NO black vote.  If the democrats have the same policies to blacks as Republicans, we don't have to vote for any of them.  If a waiter tells you there are only two options on the menu, piss water or piss coffee you don't have to drink piss, you get up, you go home and make your own food and drink.

This next election cycle is a pivotal time for DemoRATS and if they want to be electable, they are going to have to figure out what to do with 40 million disgruntled citizens. #Reparations #ADOS #TANGIBLES2020 #StayOnCode

MLK said it best:


I like that one, tangibles 2020, give us some tangibles or fuck off racist democrats, we see who you are.
Reply
#62
(02-12-2019, 07:12 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 10:45 AM)Spops53190 Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 04:39 AM)Ipay4 Wrote: https://rollingout.com/2015/10/07/obama-...survivors/

So much for "reparations is unfeasible" Sanders.  The party that believes men dressed up like women and freaks and cross dressing should be able to go to washrooms with little girls, when we've all encountered the inkwerekwere who has tried to peek at our dick in the urinal, is telling us how identity politics is wrong?  Funny, do they ever go to AIPAC and tell them all of the middle east matters and identity politics is wrong and we are going to defend all of the middle east.

No black agenda, NO black vote.  If the democrats have the same policies to blacks as Republicans, we don't have to vote for any of them.  If a waiter tells you there are only two options on the menu, piss water or piss coffee you don't have to drink piss, you get up, you go home and make your own food and drink.

That isn't comparable. At the end of the day, you can go to another store and buy something without piss. But if black people don't vote, you can't just elect a "black people president" later, the rest of the country will still vote and elect a president, so it would be wise to still vote for the candidates that benefit you the most.

A better analogy would be an unstoppable, apocalyptic meteor heading towards the earth, and one side decides on piss water rations and the other decides piss coffee rations. That meteor is gonna hit regardless, but you can still have SOME decision over what happens next. Piss flavored water, or coffee with a shot of piss.

The analogy presumes it was the only restaurant in town, simply because there are really only two parties who have any chance of winning.  But even if you go to the "other" store, there are only 2 realistic options. Republicans serving shit cake and shit pies and Democrats serving piss water and piss coffee.  You don't have to pick either of them.

It would be unwise to vote for a candidate that "most benefits" you knowing that their policies will be harmful to the broader black community.  We don't care what the rest of the country does, we are not the followers of this society, we are the builders of it and the moral leaders of it.

It would be most wise to withhold your vote and move strategically, keep your powder dry for when a candidate comes along who supports black agenda comes along for us to throw our support behind.  I'd not waste my vote supporting someone who doesn't propose specific solutions to black issues.  Black votes mean something, and blacks should not give away their voting power for nothing, the other Americans who vote are getting government goodies and $$$ from government to do so, so they have a reason to vote, if they don't give us a reason to vote, we don't.  And white christian southerners did this back in the 1990s, they refused to vote because HW Bush was not "Christian" extreme enough, now they have Donald Trump appointing anti-abortion judges and a Christian extreme agenda shoved down the rest of America.

I've read studies which show boycotting elections and not voting are valid political strategies.

Sure, withholding your vote to get better incentives in a future election is a valid option. Didn't realize that was your main concern. But I feel you're missing one of the bigger points. For that initial election, shit cakes and piss water ARE the only option. Black people have no way of avoiding or changing the policies of the initially elected president. And I can honestly see the Dems taking their chances the first election, even knowing that black people are gonna boycott, just because they still want to appeal to certain groups of white people who'd be offended by any vested effort to appease black people.

So I believe it's important to also weigh the stakes. NOT voting when the stakes are disastrous on one end and an unfair compromise on the other would be a mistake. In that case, I'd take the compromise over the disaster. Otherwise, I'd wait until both candidates were more or less even in their effect on black people to try a mass withholding of votes. And I'd doubt that Republicans would ever go in that direction, so we'd NEED the left to lose because of the lack of a black vote first.

I'm not really on board with most of what you say, but I can understand the basis of what you're saying here.
Reply
#63
(02-12-2019, 07:14 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 04:03 PM)Theo Younf Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 04:39 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 02:08 AM)Theo Younf Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 12:49 AM)Ipay4 Wrote: No, it isn't SJW are about everyone except black folks
-gays and fags
-trans
-illegals
-humpbacks
-transsexuals
-peg legs
-lesbians
-environment
-protecting religions like muslims
-hispanics
-Asians


Your SJW are the whites in NYC who are stomping on the backs of black kids as teachers telling them this is what slavery would feel like, or they are the white parents in NYC arguing with the principal and superintendent to NOT INTEGRATE the school with black kids.  White SJW hate blacks more than the right wing does, they are just more clever at hiding their anti black hatred.  They will pat  you on the head and say see I love black people, I have a black friend, I slept with a black man, but ask them about what are you going to do punish white supremacist with jail time or what are you going to do to reparate blacks for slavery, jim crow, red lining, discrimination etc. and CRICKETS!  Then they will turn around and tell you about how the gay agenda will help black people because there are gay blacks, but they will never say the black agenda will help gays because there are black gays.

Dr. King was right, white liberal moderates and SJW are worse than the klan.  They make you think they are on your side so they can infiltrate you and attack your movement from the inside.

Ipay4, you are onto something here. Bernie Sanders refused to support reparations for native blacks but then waffles on about these very groups that supposedly have native black people's interest at heart.



His attitude towards blacks is similar to most white Democrats/liberals, including the extreme left of the party, ''progressives'' just like him (i.e. TYT, Liz Warren), very arrogant and racist in their dismissiveness of a black agenda or black concerns. Yet they will speak at length about environmental concerns, LGBTQ rights, (white) feminism, the (white) working class etc. 

Goto 2:20 to the video under.



They will dismiss anything regarding blacks as "identity politics" on one hand but talk about supporting policies for LGBTQ, the white working class etc.

I'm glad Hillary lost because it gave white Democrats like Bernie got a rude awakening that cannot any longer ignore the black voting block who decided that enough was enough.
https://rollingout.com/2015/10/07/obama-...survivors/

So much for "reparations is unfeasible" Sanders.  The party that believes men dressed up like women and freaks and cross dressing should be able to go to washrooms with little girls, when we've all encountered the inkwerekwere who has tried to peek at our dick in the urinal, is telling us how identity politics is wrong?  Funny, do they ever go to AIPAC and tell them all of the middle east matters and identity politics is wrong and we are going to defend all of the middle east.

No black agenda, NO black vote.  If the democrats have the same policies to blacks as Republicans, we don't have to vote for any of them.  If a waiter tells you there are only two options on the menu, piss water or piss coffee you don't have to drink piss, you get up, you go home and make your own food and drink.

This next election cycle is a pivotal time for DemoRATS and if they want to be electable, they are going to have to figure out what to do with 40 million disgruntled citizens. #Reparations #ADOS #TANGIBLES2020 #StayOnCode

MLK said it best:


I like that one, tangibles 2020, give us some tangibles or fuck off racist democrats, we see who you are.
Blacks could vote for justice democrats that did talk about reparations instead of Hillary types that sellouts like Sharpton push.
Reply
#64
JUSTice Democrats are JUST as bad. Cenk is a POS, look at the list of their issues NOT ONE about reparations for ADOS.
Vaginas are for making babies and love. Buttholes are for making sex...
[Image: charity-crawford-julesjordan-interracial-sex-scene.gif]
[-] The following 1 user Likes Theo Younf's post:
  • Ipay4
Reply
#65
(02-12-2019, 07:50 AM)Spops53190 Wrote:
(02-12-2019, 07:12 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 10:45 AM)Spops53190 Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 04:39 AM)Ipay4 Wrote: https://rollingout.com/2015/10/07/obama-...survivors/

So much for "reparations is unfeasible" Sanders.  The party that believes men dressed up like women and freaks and cross dressing should be able to go to washrooms with little girls, when we've all encountered the inkwerekwere who has tried to peek at our dick in the urinal, is telling us how identity politics is wrong?  Funny, do they ever go to AIPAC and tell them all of the middle east matters and identity politics is wrong and we are going to defend all of the middle east.

No black agenda, NO black vote.  If the democrats have the same policies to blacks as Republicans, we don't have to vote for any of them.  If a waiter tells you there are only two options on the menu, piss water or piss coffee you don't have to drink piss, you get up, you go home and make your own food and drink.

That isn't comparable. At the end of the day, you can go to another store and buy something without piss. But if black people don't vote, you can't just elect a "black people president" later, the rest of the country will still vote and elect a president, so it would be wise to still vote for the candidates that benefit you the most.

A better analogy would be an unstoppable, apocalyptic meteor heading towards the earth, and one side decides on piss water rations and the other decides piss coffee rations. That meteor is gonna hit regardless, but you can still have SOME decision over what happens next. Piss flavored water, or coffee with a shot of piss.

The analogy presumes it was the only restaurant in town, simply because there are really only two parties who have any chance of winning.  But even if you go to the "other" store, there are only 2 realistic options. Republicans serving shit cake and shit pies and Democrats serving piss water and piss coffee.  You don't have to pick either of them.

It would be unwise to vote for a candidate that "most benefits" you knowing that their policies will be harmful to the broader black community.  We don't care what the rest of the country does, we are not the followers of this society, we are the builders of it and the moral leaders of it.

It would be most wise to withhold your vote and move strategically, keep your powder dry for when a candidate comes along who supports black agenda comes along for us to throw our support behind.  I'd not waste my vote supporting someone who doesn't propose specific solutions to black issues.  Black votes mean something, and blacks should not give away their voting power for nothing, the other Americans who vote are getting government goodies and $$$ from government to do so, so they have a reason to vote, if they don't give us a reason to vote, we don't.  And white christian southerners did this back in the 1990s, they refused to vote because HW Bush was not "Christian" extreme enough, now they have Donald Trump appointing anti-abortion judges and a Christian extreme agenda shoved down the rest of America.

I've read studies which show boycotting elections and not voting are valid political strategies.

Sure, withholding your vote to get better incentives in a future election is a valid option. Didn't realize that was your main concern. But I feel you're missing one of the bigger points. For that initial election, shit cakes and piss water ARE the only option. Black people have no way of avoiding or changing the policies of the initially elected president. And I can honestly see the Dems taking their chances the first election, even knowing that black people are gonna boycott, just because they still want to appeal to certain groups of white people who'd be offended by any vested effort to appease black people.

So I believe it's important to also weigh the stakes. NOT voting when the stakes are disastrous on one end and an unfair compromise on the other would be a mistake. In that case, I'd take the compromise over the disaster. Otherwise, I'd wait until both candidates were more or less even in their effect on black people to try a mass withholding of votes. And I'd doubt that Republicans would ever go in that direction, so we'd NEED the left to lose because of the lack of a black vote first.

I'm not really on board with most of what you say, but I can understand the basis of what you're saying here.
Well there is a third option, eat neither, walk away.  I agree, Black people cannot magically avoid the policies of the elected president.  I agree, dems will try to plow ahead without black voters.

The stakes under Trump have been no worse than under Obama or another Democrat who won't even acknowledge our issues. The Dems and Republicans have the EXACT SAME POLICIES, towards blacks, which is not to fix the issues.  The Republicans deny it completely, where as the dems do a the wiki leaks show and say we understand your concerns and take them seriously but  DO NOT PROMISE ANY ACTUAL LAW SOLUTIONS.  There is no difference, just one pretends to care and the other doesn't.

It isn't a compromise, the compromise is blacks vote and get nothing, or don't vote and get nothing, how the hell is that a compromise?  What did the dems do that they didn't want to do as in a compromise you usually give up 50% of the things you want and get 50% of what you do, blacks get NOTHING from DEms, its not a compromise but an autocracy really, "you niggers are going to vote for me or else the Republicans" is NOT a compromise.

There is no difference between Republicans and Democrats in regard to their actually laws passed for black people, both are pro-police, both are anti-reparatons, both are pro mass incarceration, both are anti-pro black policies.  I've never heard a single democratic senator come out and say here is how many billions we will spend on the black agenda, so no, they are the same policies, just different rhetoric.
Reply
#66
(02-13-2019, 12:54 PM)Theo Younf Wrote: JUSTice Democrats are JUST as bad. Cenk is a POS, look at the list of their issues NOT ONE about reparations for ADOS.

Justice for everyone except blacks, this is why the socialist whites are as BAD as the Republicans, they all oppose ADOS interest.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Ipay4's post:
  • Theo Younf
Reply
#67
(02-13-2019, 06:46 AM)sapphi10489 Wrote:
(02-12-2019, 07:14 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 04:03 PM)Theo Younf Wrote:
(02-11-2019, 04:39 AM)Ipay4 Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 02:08 AM)Theo Younf Wrote: Ipay4, you are onto something here. Bernie Sanders refused to support reparations for native blacks but then waffles on about these very groups that supposedly have native black people's interest at heart.



His attitude towards blacks is similar to most white Democrats/liberals, including the extreme left of the party, ''progressives'' just like him (i.e. TYT, Liz Warren), very arrogant and racist in their dismissiveness of a black agenda or black concerns. Yet they will speak at length about environmental concerns, LGBTQ rights, (white) feminism, the (white) working class etc. 

Goto 2:20 to the video under.



They will dismiss anything regarding blacks as "identity politics" on one hand but talk about supporting policies for LGBTQ, the white working class etc.

I'm glad Hillary lost because it gave white Democrats like Bernie got a rude awakening that cannot any longer ignore the black voting block who decided that enough was enough.
https://rollingout.com/2015/10/07/obama-...survivors/

So much for "reparations is unfeasible" Sanders.  The party that believes men dressed up like women and freaks and cross dressing should be able to go to washrooms with little girls, when we've all encountered the inkwerekwere who has tried to peek at our dick in the urinal, is telling us how identity politics is wrong?  Funny, do they ever go to AIPAC and tell them all of the middle east matters and identity politics is wrong and we are going to defend all of the middle east.

No black agenda, NO black vote.  If the democrats have the same policies to blacks as Republicans, we don't have to vote for any of them.  If a waiter tells you there are only two options on the menu, piss water or piss coffee you don't have to drink piss, you get up, you go home and make your own food and drink.

This next election cycle is a pivotal time for DemoRATS and if they want to be electable, they are going to have to figure out what to do with 40 million disgruntled citizens. #Reparations #ADOS #TANGIBLES2020 #StayOnCode

MLK said it best:


I like that one, tangibles 2020, give us some tangibles or fuck off racist democrats, we see who you are.
Blacks could vote for justice democrats that did talk about reparations instead of Hillary types that sellouts like Sharpton push.

AOC says reparations should go to mexicans and puerto ricans  and blacks and it should not go past the new deal era.  Mexicans who weren't in the country and the chicanos classified as legal whites puerto ricans enslaved by hispanics are now the same as ados? Why does it stop at the new deal? They are no friends of blacks.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Ipay4's post:
  • Theo Younf
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)