Emily Austin
#81
(09-14-2018, 04:30 AM)kingdarius Wrote: that brothalovers scene was horrendous. I mean there was not an ounce of excitement. I've had better sex coming off a 13hr work shift, where i could barely keep my eyes open, than what was displayed in that scene. Jeez

Pretty much this. I don't know why everyone here is trying to psychoanalyze the girl to try to figure out if the QOS shit is legit or not. She could be 100% truthful about that and it wouldn't change the fact that her performances have been very lackluster since returning. Porn is visual - I don't need to know what the girl is or isn't thinking to judge whether a scene is enjoyable or not.
~~ PM me about dead links or if you need help finding rare IR scenes - I will try my best ~~
[-] The following 1 user Likes un57's post:
  • Blackpleasure79
Reply
#82
(09-14-2018, 07:57 AM)un57 Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 04:30 AM)kingdarius Wrote: that brothalovers scene was horrendous. I mean there was not an ounce of excitement. I've had better sex coming off a 13hr work shift, where i could barely keep my eyes open, than what was displayed in that scene. Jeez

Pretty much this. I don't know why everyone here is trying to psychoanalyze the girl to try to figure out if the QOS shit is legit or not. She could be 100% truthful about that and it wouldn't change the fact that her performances have been very lackluster since returning. Porn is visual - I don't need to know what the girl is or isn't thinking to judge whether a scene is enjoyable or not.

My point was that Emily has never been a great performer. She has always looked like she is just going through the motions of having sex as opposed to actually enjoying it or at least being able to fake it enough for us to think that she is. I can't think of one scene of hers where she killed it. She is a favorite of mine because of how she looks, not how she fucks.
Reply
#83
Some value things different. Some put a heavy weight on performance and less of a weight on looks and vice versa. What's weird is, knowing a girl has never been a great performer for years and years, but still coming into her thread to complain about her performances. It's like going into a Sara Jay thread and saying how ugly she is every time she has a new scene drop. Pointlessly obsessive, IMO.
[Image: 7p10mnlqnzhmwpza.gif]
Reply
#84
well i mean when she takes years off and then comes back with a nicer body, you're gonna check out the scene to see if something has changed. Lexi cruz was one of the most boring performers of all time but she was so fine i had to watch all her shit *shrugs*
Reply
#85
Yeah, no.

I don't give a damn about performance.

1) Is she hot.

2) Is the scene well lit/well shot.

3) Do the positions compliment her.

4) Can the dude keep it up.


That's really my criteria for a scene. I don't do sound, so I don't care what she says or what noise she makes. Aggressive head is a plus, quality facials are a plus. But not necessary. Just look good and don't be a dodger.
White Girl Connoisseur
[Image: OxvA.gif]
[-] The following 1 user Likes Shotgun Styles's post:
  • whiteisright4bbc
Reply
#86
I'm big on seeing a pretty woman getting off, or, at least, looking like she does.
I'm also big on seeing a hot chic getting smashed, in just the right position, at just the right angle - sometimes that's all a brotha needs.

What can I say, performance is big for me.

So are looks.

And the female form -- in general.

The right pic can do as much as the right scene. The right position can do as much as the right performance, especially BM/WW.

It's why I'm big into IR...

...and why the likes of Emily Austin, Lexi Cruz, Amber Cox and countless others can do it for me even when their overall performances don't.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)